Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Effect of Drivers of Urban Expansion on Food Security in Moderating Role of Governance Response

Received: 2 September 2024     Accepted: 23 September 2024     Published: 29 November 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study examines effect of urban expansion on food security in moderating role of governance response in Addis Ababa. The purpose of the study was to create understanding regarding the nexus between drivers of urban expansion, peri-urban livelihood food security and the moderation role of the governance responses. The study design was concurrent explanatory design. It was concurrent explanatory cross sectional due to collection of both forms of data roughly at the same time. The data collected were analyzed by using structural equation model and thematic analysis. Both primary and secondary data sources were incorporated in this study for complementary and triangulation purposes. The data were collected from randomly selected exurban household heads of Limi Kura Sub-city (woreda 6 and 14) and Akaki Kality Sub-city (woreda 9 and 13). Of the total returned responses, 382 questionnaires, 52 interviewees of whom 36 for in-depth interviews and 16 for key informant interview (KII) were analyzed by using SPSS version 25, AMOS and MAXQDA 2020. The moderating role of the government abate the negative relationship between drivers of urban expansion and food security by 59%, the interview result suggests the need for strong institution framework and policy response to minimize the exposure of exurban households. Thus, the researcher suggested the strong governance intervention through institutional and policy intervention as well as revisiting alternative strategies of inclusive and sustainable development. Furthermore, the researcher also suggested the need to give attention to the issue of urban expansion swallowing of ecosystem service and posing threat to food security.

Published in International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems (Volume 10, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijmfs.20241001.12
Page(s) 17-34
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Urban Expansion, Peri-urban, Food Security, Governance, Institution, Policy

1. Introduction
The governance of human activities and their effects on Ecosystem Services (ESS) have received less attention in research. The relationship between the natural and social systems and how humans govern Ecosystem Services is poorly understood. The simple dissemination of scientific information regarding the state of Ecosystem Services will not be sufficient to stop the trend of ecosystems' declining conditions. To comprehend how humans regulate ecosystems, it will be required to have other types of knowledge, such as normative, traditional, and transformational knowledge .
The limited attention to policy implementation and governance in the ecosystem service context is surprising . Studies indicated that pure science on ecosystem emphasis on biodiversity conservation , which is not effective enough to change human behaviour. This reflected the need to assess how human activities, interaction and intervention affect ecosystem in order to achieve effective desired outcome, through analysing the policy implementation and analysing its practice empirically.
An integrated framework is required to assess the ecological implications of alternative urban development patterns and to develop policies to manage urban areas in the face of change. In particular, strategies for urban growth management will require such integrated knowledge to maintain ecological resilience by preventing development pressure on ecosystem services . Most of the researches have applied the Shannon’s Entropy model that uncontrolled expansion crossed the threshold of 0.5 entropy value .
Researches on Ecosystem service governance modes are geographically diversified. Decision-makers in well-studied areas can use a pool on studied arrangements, in other areas decision-makers may find limited literature to inform their decisions to maintain and strengthen ecosystem services Numerous researchers call for the consideration of the role of governance as a driver in the dynamics of the ecosystem services. They also suggested the importance of brief identify and synthesize of governance dimensions for sustainable transitions of cities in which social-ecological interaction(SEI) is prominent .
Interdisciplinary, landscape planning, and science-policy integration were seen as the most promising approaches to enhance Comprehensive Ecosystem (CES) policy and management. The Study result also showed that experts believe the Comprehensive Ecosystem (CES) concept is still far from being implemented in agricultural landscape policies. Therefore, to maintain such systems, they proposed better inter- and trans-disciplinary research for CES-integrative policy and decision-making .
Changes in land use / cover refer to changes in land features such as vegetation, soil, and climate, whereas changes in land use refer to changes in how humans use or manage land. Land cover change is caused by natural processes, but land use change is human-induced . This change is responsible for many local and global effects, including biodiversity loss, habitat loss, and loss of ecosystem services .
Economists and policymakers have changed most of the world's land-use/land-cover in recent years . To date, from the researcher’s knowledge no national study has assessed the impact of Land Use Land Cover Change (LULCC) on ecosystem service values. Insufficient information resulted in a lack of emphasis on ecological services. So, for a long time, the issue of ecosystem services was ignored by all levels of government and the private sector. Unawareness of ecosystem services eroded the value of natural capital. Human actions, natural phenomena, and lack of strong systemic safeguard deteriorated potential sources of ecological services, posing challenges to human life .
Human settlements have replaced agricultural and natural ecosystems as a major component of global change . By 2030, nearly half of the world's population will be living in cities according to UN report of 2018. It presents new governance challenges to manage urban green space in the context of an on-going social-ecological transition. .... Gathering and managing land to preserve or boost the flow of ecosystem services related to green places
Many studies focus more on the physical assessment of landscapes change while paying little to no regard to the social-ecological-governance dimension from the perspective of the public policy, actors and professional viewpoints . Alberti made the claim that human beings have an impact on ecosystem functions and that changes to ecosystem services also have an impact on human livelihood.
The concept of an ecosystem as a coupled human-ecological system that develops as a result of dynamic interactions between human and ecological functions is novel. Urban regions rely on ecosystems for important natural services [16]. Human well-being is impacted when ecosystems change--water bodies lose, vegetation, arable land is converted to built-up space, and so on—which causes food insecurity.
Above all the expansion of urban by consuming the neighbouring potential ecosystem service areas including agricultural land highly impacts the livelihood of agricultural dependent households. But, the impact of urban expansion on the peri-urban household livelihood either neglected or enveloped by the attention given to urban expansion initiative . Therefore, these studies aim to investigate drivers of urban expansion effect on peri-urban household livelihood through moderation role of governance responses to fill gap and contribute in the world of academy.
Conceptual Framework
The study explores the impact of urban expansion drivers on peri-urban households experiencing food insecurity, with a specific focus on the moderating role of governance. The overall framework can be illustrated as follows. From this general framework, a second conceptual framework has been extracted for the purpose of this study.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of the study. Adapted from DFID (2000).
Figure 2. Model identification framework.
Y (FS)= β0+aX+d(X*W)+e(1)
Y (FS)= β0+(DF*Gr)+e(2)
Notice: FS= Food Security, DF=Drivers Force, Gr=Governance response
2. Methodology
This study is grounded in the philosophical framework of Pragmatism, which emphasizes a practical approach to knowledge acquisition and prioritizes the application of findings in real-world contexts. The research employs a concurrent mixed-methods approach, integrating both qualitative and quantitative methodologies to provide a comprehensive understanding of the research problem. Specifically, the inquiry follows a non-experimental design that is suited to explore relationships and trends without manipulating variables. Abductive reasoning was utilized throughout the research process. This approach involves generating hypotheses and explanations based on the observed data, allowing for flexibility and refinement of ideas as new information emerges. Data were collected using a combination of primary and secondary sources: A structured questionnaire was administered to gather quantitative data. Qualitative insights were obtained through semi-structured interviews, facilitating a deeper exploration of participants' perspectives and experiences. Field observations were conducted to gather contextual information and validate findings from other data sources. Data from existing documents and literature were reviewed to support the research findings and contextualize the primary data. Data analysis involved the application of the structural question method and iterative techniques. The structural question method enabled systematic examination of responses, while iterative techniques facilitated ongoing refinement of the analysis based on emerging patterns and themes. Through this multifaceted approach, the research aims to produce a robust and nuanced understanding of the study topic, balancing rich qualitative insights with quantitative rigor.
Drivers of urban expansion have a negative and significant effect on peri-urban households’ food security through moderating role of governance response,
Statistical techniques:Moderator effect (d)=a*d
3. Result and Discussion
3.1. Result
Composite Reliability (Indicators reliability Analysis)
KMO and Bartlett's Test
This test is necessary to measure sampling adequacy. It also helps to evaluate the sum total correlation matrix.
Table 1. KMO and Bartlett's test.

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy.

.935

Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

Approx. Chi-Square

17803.914

df

1176

Sig.

.000

Table 2. Standardized factor loading and Critical Ratio (CR).

Constructs

CR

Standardized factor loadings

t-value/ Reg. Weights

P

Economic growth factor(EGF)

8.436

Item1.

.727

*****

***

Item2.

.760

15.969

***

Item3.

.732

15.622

***

Item4.

.746

17.047

***

Item5.

.768

14.493

***

Population growth factor(PGF)

11.093

Item1.

.797

***

Item2.

.827

26.977

***

Item3.

.754

25.178

***

Item4.

.819

23.714

***

Item5.

.741

23.435

***

Infrastructure expansion(IEF)

12.290

Item1.

.701

***

Item2.

.635

26.641

***

Item3.

.718

27.813

***

Item4.

.635

23.398

***

Item5.

.697

26.027

***

Government direction factor(GDF)

9.678

Item1.

.687

***

Item2.

.724

21.954

***

Item3.

.787

19.913

***

Item4.

.795

22.898

***

Item5.

.742

17.734

***

Governance response(GR)

8.136

Item1.

.753

****

Item2.

.783

15.241

***

Item3.

.822

16.281

***

Item4.

.828

16.066

***

Item5.

.802

15.896

***

Item6.

.806

15.596

***

Item7.

.828

16.805

***

Item8.

.824

16.241

***

Item9.

.837

16.609

***

Item10.

.831

16.499

***

Food Security(FS)

8.418

Item1.

.739

****

Item2.

.786

15.809

***

Item3.

.705

12.853

***

Item4.

.761

15.791

***

Item5.

.791

15.939

***

Item6.

.821

16.864

***

Item7.

.861

17.901

***

Item8.

.805

16.512

***

Item9.

.842

17.536

***

Table 3. Normality test.

Variable

min

max

skew

c.r.

kurtosis

c.r.

Spd15

1.000

5.000

-.376

-1.002

-.153

-.610

Spd14

1.000

5.000

-.584

-1.658

.272

1.084

Spd13

2.000

5.000

-.217

-1.735

-.205

-.819

Spd12

2.000

5.000

-.460

-1.671

-.098

-.389

Spd11

2.000

5.000

-.350

-2.794

-.468

-1.867

Mgd20

1.000

5.000

-.339

-2.707

-.029

-.117

Mgd19

2.000

5.000

-.130

-1.037

-.246

-.981

Mgd18

2.000

5.000

-.010

-.080

-.288

-1.147

Mgd17

2.000

5.000

-.366

-2.923

.301

1.201

Mgd16

1.000

5.000

-.079

-.630

-.140

-.561

Ed5

2.000

5.000

-.278

-2.222

-.376

-1.498

Ed4

1.000

5.000

-.078

-.619

-.816

-3.256

Ed3

2.000

5.000

-.497

-1.967

.164

.654

Ed2

2.000

5.000

-.356

-2.840

-.368

-1.469

Ed1

2.000

5.000

-.228

-1.822

-.486

-1.939

Dtd10

1.000

5.000

-.770

-1.142

-.209

-.834

Dtd9

1.000

5.000

-.651

-1.197

-.098

-.391

Dd8

1.000

5.000

-.674

-1.380

-.487

-1.943

Dtd7

1.000

5.000

-.762

-1.076

-.230

-.918

Dtd6

1.000

5.000

-.733

-1.847

-.133

-.530

Ph9

1.000

5.000

-.825

-1.580

-.681

-.716

Ph8

1.000

5.000

-1.049

-1.373

-.040

-.162

Qh7

1.000

5.000

-.873

-.964

-.481

-1.919

Ph6

1.000

5.000

-.274

-2.187

-1.189

-.742

Ph5

1.000

5.000

-.326

-2.599

.451

1.799

Qh4

1.000

5.000

-1.169

-.326

1.245

.968

Qh3

1.000

5.000

-1.266

-1.100

1.111

.434

Ph2

1.000

5.000

-.911

-1.266

-.273

-1.090

Qh1

1.000

5.000

-1.308

-1.435

1.855

.399

PSpi10

1.000

5.000

-.866

-1.906

.583

.324

ISpi9

1.000

5.000

-.845

-1.746

.293

1.169

PSpi8

1.000

5.000

-.748

-.966

.111

.444

ISpi7

1.000

5.000

-.846

-.747

.129

.514

PSpi6

1.000

5.000

-.725

-.782

-.083

-.332

ISpi5

1.000

5.000

-.804

-.419

-.187

-.746

PSpi4

1.000

5.000

-.798

-1.370

-.117

-.468

PSpi3

1.000

5.000

-.675

-1.384

-.331

-1.319

PSpi2

1.000

5.000

-.805

-1.421

.059

.234

ISpi1

1.000

5.000

-.676

-2.392

-.021

-.083

Multivariate

6.004

1.913

Source: own constructed 2023/24

Download: Download full-size image

Figure 3. Measurement Model.
Reliability and Validity assessment
Construct Validity
As usual, the construct validity of moderation model with 39 items was assessed through the factor loading and with Varimax rotation using SPSS version 25 software. Sample adequacy was also established through KMO,
Convergent and discriminant validity
AVE, MSV, and CR were used to assess convergent and discriminant validity. AVE should be >0.5 and CR>AVE for convergent validity. MSV should be less than AVE for discriminant validity .
Table 4. Convergent and divergent validity.

Model validity measurement

CR

AVE

MSV

MaxR(H)

Govr

FS

PGF

EGF

GDF

IEF

Govr

0.951

0.658

0.203

0.952

0.811

FS

0.939

0.631

0.203

0.945

-0.45

0.794

PGF

0.943

0.768

0.637

0.945

0.203

-0.204

0.876

EGF

0.89

0.619

0.523

0.895

0.091

-0.125

0.681

0.787

GDF

0.931

0.73

0.592

0.941

0.208

-0.284

0.684

0.693

0.854

IEF

0.937

0.748

0.637

0.949

0.198

-0.273

0.798

0.723

0.769

0.865

No validity concern

Source: Field survey data, 2023
As usual the alternative discriminant validity analysis was performed by using HTMT analysis method, view table 5.
Table 5. HTMT validity test method.

HTMT Analysis

Govr

FS

PGF

EGF

GDF

IEF

Govr

FS

0.449

PGF

0.198

0.216

EGF

0.099

0.134

0.68

GDF

0.204

0.309

0.687

0.712

IEF

0.195

0.283

0.804

0.725

0.779

HTMT Warnings

There are no warnings for this HTMT analysis

Source: field survey data, 2023
Testing either governance response moderating the relationship between drivers of urban expansion and peri-urban communities’ livelihood or not.
Analyzing the moderating effect for the model with latent construct is very necessary, but complicated. The normal modeling procedure using interaction terms is not practical with latent constructs. The normal procedure causes problems with model convergence and standard errors distortion. Therefore, the researcher was applied mean centering mixed model method to evaluate whether governance response play moderating role or not. The mean values of independent variable, and moderating variable was calculated by using SPSS version 25. After the mean obtained, the mean centered variable was created. To have had the mean centered variable, the researcher subtracted the mean center from the original variable. The new name created for the created new variable. Next the interaction variable (Dr*Gr) was created by multiplying the mean centered variable of independent original variable by the mean centered value of the moderator variable. The mixed model method includes the latent unobservable variables with the independent and dependent variables in a model, but includes a composite moderator variable along with composite interaction variable. In such a model including the composite variable (in our case interaction variable) and unobservable variable construct, there is no true test of a full structural model. Furthermore, in order to obtain interaction variable, independent unobservable construct or latent variable and moderator latent variable must be transformed into composite variable. To do so both should be mean-centered at first stage.
Subsequently, the researcher need to identify the path of interest where the moderator variable to be assessed. After identification of the path of interest, the particular path would be constrained with parameter=1 and made constrained model. The aim was to estimate two separated models: constrained and unconstrained model. There was a procedure the researcher follows as steps to work on this. The first step was splitting the data into two groups based on the moderator variable tested. The researcher recodes indifferent the moderator variable by calculating its mean average. The value above mean average into high (coded_2) and the value below mean average into low (coded_1). Next to that the researcher sorts the splinted data ascending and created two categories of datasets (dataset_1 and dataset-2). Next, the researcher created two models (Model-1 and Model_2) by using AMOS version 24. Then, the researcher named model_1 as constrained model and model_2 as unconstrained model. In unconstrained model the relationship in the path of interest did not constrained (left free of path estimate=1). Following this step by using the two data sets turn by turn for both models the constrained and unconstrained models were estimated to calculate or obtain the chi-square result. Obtaining the result was help to know the difference between constrained and unconstrained models chi-square value. If the difference of the chi-square value between constrained and unconstrained model greater than 3.84, then we can decided that the moderation occurs in that path . This the necessary prerequisite step before testing the moderation or interaction effects between the two variables (predictor and outcome variable).
In this study the researcher modeling the effect of the derivers of urban expansion (EGF, PGF, IEF, and GDF) on peri-urban household food insecurity dimension adapted from FAO experiencing food insecurity scale). One of the objectives for this study was to examine the moderation effects of governance responses (policy, institutional, regulation...) in the relationship path between drivers’ urban expansion and peri-urban livelihood (from the angle of food security). Following the mentioned steps, the researcher conducted the test to ensure whither governance response moderate the relationship between drivers of urban expansion and peri-urban household food insecurity as a precondition. Accordingly:
Step 1: Low governance response: the output for constrained model
Figure 4. Constrained low governance.
Step 2: Low governance response: the output for unconstrained model
Figure 5. Unconstrained low governance.
Step 3: The moderation test for low governance response moderation
Table 6. Moderation result of low governance.

Constrained model

Unconstrained model

Chi-square difference

Result in moderation

Result on hypothesis

Chi- square

161.67

108.21

53.46

Greater than 3.84 and significant

Supported

Df

52

51

1

The hypothesis statement: Ha: Governance response moderates the relationship between drivers of urban expansion and peri-urban household food insecurity.

Source: field survey data
Step1: High governance response: the output for constrained model
Figure 6. Constrained high governance.
Step 2: high governance response unconstrained model:
Figure 7. Unconstrained high governance.
Step 3: The moderation test for high governance response moderation
Table 7. Moderation test result of high governance.

Constrained model

Unconstrained model

Chi-square difference

Result in moderation

Result on hypothesis

Chi- square

270.99

241.73

29.26

Greater than 3.84 and significant

Supported

Df

52

51

1

The hypothesis statement:

Ha: Governance response moderates the relationship between drivers of urban expansion and peri-urban household food insecurity.

Interaction effect analysis
Researchers use two steps method of interaction variable effect analysis . At the first step they assess the standard deviation unit of change in the absence of interaction variable that alter the relationship between independent and dependent variables. At the second step they add interaction variables that alter the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. The result depicted in the graph indicated the change of values both on the path coefficient as well as the coefficient determination without and with the interaction variable. For more clarity, view the diagram below.
Step 1: Without interaction variable
Figure 8. Interaction effects without interaction variable.
Step 1 without interaction variable
Step 2: With interaction Variable
Figure 9. Interaction effects with interaction variable.
Step 2 with interaction variable
The difference of coefficient of determination (Chi square)
Table 8. The difference of coefficient of determination (Chi square).

The difference of coefficient of determination(Chi square)

Step 1(without interaction variable)

Step2(With interaction variable)

differece

Moderation effect

.22

.23

0.1

Yes

As it was mentioned, the independent variable is the one whose relationship with the dependent is being moderated. In our context the interactincc DUE represented independent variable which was the composite of drivers of urban expansion, FS represent dependent variable i.e., food secuity, interactinccGr represents the moderator and it’s the composit of governance response and DrGr stands for the interaction term or product variable. By using the stats tools package, at 3 intercept/constant and unstandardized estimate values, the researcher attempted to evaluate the moderation effect, results are indicated in the following figure.
Figure 10. Moderation effect.
Moderation effect
From the graphic presentation, the result demonstrated InteractinccGr (governance response) dampens the negative relationship between interactinccDUE (drivers/factors of urban expansion) and FS (food security).
Covariance and Correlations
Examining and interpreting variance output in AMOS is necessary to ensure the structural equation model reliability and validity by addressing the problem related to Heywood negative variances cases. Negative variance estimate in AMOS are considered inadmissible and indicate issues with the model, leading to unreliable results https://www.ibm.com/support:3/23/2024; 4:47 PM). The researcher checked the issue and found that there was no problem with Heywood related variance cases and the AMOS output result were presented in the table 9.
Correlations and covariance
Table 9. Covariance and Correlations.

Covariance

Correlations

S.E.

C.R.

P

Description

DrGr<-->InteractinccGr

2.562

.615

.251

10.228

***

+ and sign

DrGr<-->InteractinccDUE

4.080

.829

.327

12.458

***

+ and sign

InteractinccGr<-->InteractinccDUE

.162

.191

.044

3.664

***

+ and sign

The researcher was performed maximum likelihood estimates to assess modification effect. To decide the existence of moderation effect among two requirements or criteria at least one should be fulfilled. The first is the independent (exogenous variable), dependent (endogenous variable), interaction variable (product variable) should be significant or, second option independent not significant, but the rest mentioned two variables should be significant. If interaction variables and the rest two variables, it is not permissive to say there is moderation effect. Similarly, if moderation variable and interaction variables were not significant and the independent variable is not significant in the same manner the existence of moderation effect is not accepted. Based on this postulation:
Moderation effect
Table 10. Unstandardized and standardized estimates.

Estimate

S.E.

C.R.

P

Moderation effect

Unstandardized

Standardized

FS<---DrGr

.036

.257

.028

1.99

.048

yes

FS<---InteractinccGr

-.429

-.528

.072

-5.929

***

yes

FS<---InteractinccDUE

-.248

-.361

.084

-2.955

.003

yes

The statistical significance of the interaction variable (DrGr), exogenous variable (InteractinccDUE) and Moderator variable (InteractinccGr) depicted the presence of moderation effect. Therefore, it can be concluded that governance response is moderating between drivers/factors of urban expansion and peri-urban household food insecurity (FS).
Method 2: The path model the researcher demonstrated which includes moderating effect can be expressed by using formula:
Y2= (p1+p3*M)*Y1*M(3)
Y2 stands for exogeneous variable i.e. in our case FS; P3 stands for the product of moderator and exogenous variable or intraction variable coefficient (in our case interactinccDUE*interactinccDr); M stands for moderator(in our case interactinccDr); p1 the coefficient of Y1(interactinDUE) effect on Y2(FS); Y1 stands for exogenous variable (in our context interactinccDUE).
To understand how a moderator can be interacted in a path model, the mentioned formula rewriten as follows:
Y2=P1*y1+p2*M+p3*(Y1*M)(4)
It necessary to identify the specified coefficient in moderation effect: the effect of exogenous variable= P1*y1 ; the effect of moderator variable= p2*M; interaction(product) term=p3*(Y1*M). As a result, makes easy to understand how the coefficient p3 express how the effect P1 changes when moderator variable “M” (interactinccGr in our case) is increased or decreased by one standard deviation unit . Accorrdingly,
Y2=P1*y1+p2*M+p3*(Y1*M)(5)
Fs= -.37 + -.49 + .27…….by substituting the coefficient value of the cross ponding and respective variable in the formula, view 11.
Fs=-0.59, this express when moderator (Gr) increased by one standard deviation unit, the effect of drivers/factors of urban expansion decreased by .59 standard deviation.
Figure 11. Non- Vary moderation path diagram moderation path coefficient result.
Table 11. Unstandardized and standardized estimate. Unstandardized and standardized estimate. Unstandardized and standardized estimate.

Estimate

S.E.

C.R.

P

Interpretation

Unstandardized

Standardized

FS<---DUE

-.255

-.370

.079

-3.250

.001

-and sign

FS<---GR

-.557

-.488

.095

-5.883

***

-and sign

FS<---DrGr

.043

.267

.021

2.011

.044

+ and sign

Qualitative data: Interview and observation result
the interview result demonstrated that:
“……Although regulations exist, they are not always enforced. For instance, constructions often occur on the riverbank (by violating the set standard distance 16-25 meters), swamp area, and forest area. Buildings and waste obstruct the channel of water and floods, and green areas are turned into built-up spaces (planner u. l., 2023). Most of the time such unplanned activities were emanate from lack of commitment (planner, 2023).
This explain that the river source pollusion affected the downstream as well as the reverside vegetation. This affect the benefit obtained from the vegetation and led to agricultural potential area degradation.
“...before the prevalence of the informal settlement and land grab the government should take prevention initiative, whereas most of the time measure taken after development. (from interview with land management and transfer exp, 2023).”
Furthermore, the interview result also indicated that:
“…Ethiopia’s integrated policy responses led to expansion of unplanned olds style of development. Particularly, regularization of the former informal (unplanned) developed incorporating surrounding area in urban boundary is the good indicator” (planer expt, 2023).
Field observational data desplayed the government approach to sustain peri-urban livelihood through diary and fattening activities is wondering. However, farmers compain about ensufficience of space, water accessability and animal food inclusing grass. If the problem on the area resolved, this can be seen as alternative ways of solving household food insecurity, by generating means of income.
Figure 12. Typical livestock fattening and diary activities.
Photo by Zerihun, Akaki sub-city and Zinash, Lami Kura sub-city, 2023
Figure 13. Typical milk production and production.
There were also 180 micro-enterprises of expropriated farmers housed within the Center for Livestock Development and Excellence Center. The facility promoted excellence, created jobs, and developed livestock. This suggests that the government is strategically intervening to support peri-urban inhabitants' livelihoods, particularly those of farmers.
By Zerihun, Akaki Kality, 2023
This was an indication for government response reduction of the negative relationship between urban expansion and peri-urban household food insecurity. Litrature also indicatecd that Food security in developing countries is depends on the sustainable uses of natural resources. Since currently, following climatic change, rapid urbanization pose challenges to natural resources such as land loss, household relied on natural and physical capital highly vulnerable.
3.2. Discussion
In this study, the researcher attempted to examine the effect of drivers/factors of urban expansion on peri-urban households’ food insecurity in moderating role of governance response. The result demonstrated that governance response (InteractinccGr) dampens the negative relationship between drivers/factors of urban expansion (interactinccDUE) and peri-urban experiencing of food insecurity (FS). To confirm this, the researcher performed additional evaluation and has obtained that when moderator(Gr) increased by one standard devaition unit, the effect of drivers/factors of urban expansion decreased by .59 stanadard devation. This express the essense of governance response or action or intervention in reducing the negative relationship between drivers/factors of urban expansion and food security. The role of governmanet in reducing the adverse effect of urban epansion on ecosytem services, thereby food security is significant. Scholars also suggested that in the era of urban encroachment, enhancing ecosystem service governance is critical 20]. The interaction of the government responses(through policy, regulation, strategy, ) between the urban expansion effects on food security deminishes the streangth of the negative relationship between the two.
The interview result revailed the gap on institutional and policy intervention to regulate the impact of urban expansion. However, insstitutional framework and policy response palys essential role. In the perivious litrature it is also confirmed that in peri-urban regions government policies can influence food security by regulating land use, promoting sustainable agricultural practice, and ensuring access to food sources .
In addition to this, other scholar also stated that government intervention is essential to mangage the impact of urban sprawl, and implement policies like urban growth boundaries to control excessive horizontal expansion . The effiecient land use in most part of the world had been emphesis on compact and vertical urban growth to save sacrce agricultural land . In addition to structural, land use and landmangement approach, the government institutional framework and policy support for sustainable agriculture need to consider urban agriculture as an alternative to overcome food security. Urban agriculture contribute to food security, stability and sustainability of primarly aggricultural livelihhood style. Most of the time the full displacement and expropriation of the primarly agricultural dependent hosuehold prone them to food insurity, instability and povery in general. The interview response indicated the essentiallity of the role of governance to minimizing the effects urban expansion on ecosystem service. It was also asserted that the need for integrated planning approach and strong governance intervention mechanism. As a good model, some raised about the infant Addis Ababa farmers’ and agricultural commission beigning to encourage urban agriculture cosnidered as a good beining to ensure food security and sustain farmers. However, it is not get institutional and policy support in preserving oppen spaces and limited to guarden vegetation.
It is clear that ecosystem service directly or indirectly supports food security through provision of ecosystem services that facilitate the production The quantity of food production decreased as land seized by buildup. This affects the availability of household food as usual producing from the field. The study result shows that the population growth as driver of urban expansion affects food security through pressurizing and deteriorating ecosystem services (natural and physical capital). Therefore, corresponding to incorporating the agriculture into urban, rethinking about the unique nature of the peri-urban area is critical point . In similar manner, the previous study suggests the need to preserve ecosystem services through strong institutional framework and land management (Kremer et al., 2016). However, the transitional zone has dual nature of rural-urban interweave and still lack unique policy approach different from the usual dichotomy approach: rural and urban.
In Ethioipia the legal document provided or gave full authority to government’s centralized ownership of land [8]. In addition to this, Ethiopia proclamation No. 1161/2019 declared that any landholder can be expropriated and displaced by receiving “Displacement Compensation”. But at the same time give room for the priority right to develop as per requested by the plan. The interviewed appreciate the priority provided, and complain about its implementation from its precondition of “showing capacity”. Showing capacity may be in finance, skill and knowledge. Whereas the practical evidence not getting attention for its feasibility was that the displaced people were farmers and unskilled as well as financially incapable as per the requirement. Therefore, the interviewed persons claim either financial support scheme or the right to be shareholder with capable developers.
4. Conclusion
This study highlights the significant impact of urban expansion drivers on food insecurity among peri-urban households, underscoring the crucial moderating role of governance responses. The findings reveal that effective governance can mitigate the negative effects of urban expansion on food security, as demonstrated by a decrease of 0.59 standard deviations in the adverse impact when governance is strengthened. While current institutional frameworks and policy interventions show promise, gaps remain in regulating the effects of urban growth. Existing literature supports the notion that government policies can enhance food security by managing land use, promoting sustainable agricultural practices, and implementing urban growth boundaries. The results also emphasize the potential of urban agriculture as a vital component for increasing food stability and sustainability. A governance response aimed at integrating farming into urban planning and policy frameworks is essential for sustaining traditional and indigenous livelihoods, as well as ensuring food security for urban residents. However, the lack of adequate institutional and policy support continues to hinder efforts to preserve agricultural land and ecosystems. As urbanization intensifies, a need for integrated planning approaches and robust governance mechanisms becomes imperative. Given Ethiopia's centralized land ownership and expropriation policies, there is a pressing need for reforms that ensure fair compensation and support for displaced households. The findings suggest that governance institutions and policy approaches are crucial for mitigating the impacts of urban expansion on food security challenges. This study highlights the detrimental side effects of urban expansion, despite its contributions to modernization, and underscores the necessity of implementing effective governance strategies to mitigate these adverse effects. Furthermore, the application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) offers valuable insights into the complex and interrelated relationships among the latent variables involved in this dynamic. This study has limitations in that it does not address all dimensions of food security assessment. Given this limitation, it is crucial to address these issues in order to improve food security and safeguard ecosystem services in urban expansion era.
Abbreviations

LULCC

Land Use Land Cover Change

HTMT

Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations

UN

United Nation

Author Contributions
Chali Etefa Taye: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Dereje Teklemariam: Conceptualization, Data curation, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Endalew Addis: Conceptualization, Data curation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Afriyie, K., Abass, K., & Adjei, P. O. W. (2020). Urban sprawl and agricultural livelihood response in peri-urban Ghana. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 12(2), 202–218.
[2] Alberti, M. (2008). Advances in Urban Ecology Integrating Humans and Ecological Processes in Urban Ecosystems.
[3] Alene, E. T. (2022). Determinant factors for the expansion of informal settlement in Gondar city, Northwest Ethiopia. Journal of Urban Management, 11(3), 321–337.
[4] Anjum, S., Ahmed, I., & Kalwar, S. (2021). Mapping and Modelling of Urban Sprawl Dynamics Using Shannon’s Entropy Through Gis: a Case Study of Hyderabad City. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 3(11), 653–658.
[5] Balázsi, Á., Dänhardt, J., Collins, S., Schweiger, O., Settele, J., & Hartel, T. (2021). Understanding cultural ecosystem services related to farmlands: Expert survey in Europe. Land Use Policy, 100 (July 2020), 104900.
[6] Bargigli, S., Raugei, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2005). Handbook of Ecological Indicators for Assessment of Ecosystem Health.
[7] Bertaud, A. (2012). GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION AND URBAN LAND MARKETS: THE CASE OF CHINA Author(s): 29(4), 335–346.
[8] Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Constitution. (1995). Proclamation No. 1/1995 of the Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. 38.
[9] Green, O. O., Garmestani, A. S., Albro, S., Ban, N. C., Berland, A., Burkman, C. E., Gardiner, M. M., Gunderson, L., Hopton, M. E., Schoon, M. L., & Shuster, W. D. (2016). Adaptive governance to promote ecosystem services in urban green spaces. Urban Ecosystems, 19(1), 77–93.
[10] Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., & Briggs, J. M. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319(5864), 756–760.
[11] Hair, J. F., Hult, T. M. G., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt;, Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). An introduction to structural equation modeling.Partial least squares structural equation modeling with R. In Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation (Vol. 21, Issue 1).
[12] Hall, D., Bloom, D. E., Khanna, T., Musche, M., Adamescu, M., Angelstam, P., Bacher, S., Bäck, J., Buss, H. L., Duffy, C., Flaim, G., Gaillardet, J., Giannakis, G. V., Haase, P., Halada, L., Kissling, W. D., Lundin, L., Matteucci, G., Meesenburg, H., … Lin, Y. T. (2021). Towards Green Cities Urban Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in China and Germany. Journal of Urban Management, 8(2), 391–404.
[13] Jan_Brueckner. (2001). 1–33. papers2://publication/uuid/7616942F-9621-4369-AA7D-831063582CE0
[14] Joseph F, Hair JR., W. C. B. Ba. J.. B. and R. E. A. (2016). Multivariate Data Analysis, Seventh Edition.
[15] Joseph F. Hair, J. G. T. M. H. C. M. R. M. S. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)-Third Edition.
[16] Kremer, P., Hamstead, Z., Haase, D., McPhearson, T., Frantzeskaki, N., Andersson, E., Kabisch, N., Larondelle, N., Rall, E. L., Voigt, A., Baró, F., Bertram, C., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Hansen, R., Kaczorowska, A., Kain, J. H., Kronenberg, J., Langemeyer, J., Pauleit, S., … Elmqvist, T. (2016). Key insights for the future of urban ecosystem services research. Ecology and Society, 21(2).
[17] Kronenberg, J. (2015). Why not to green a city? Institutional barriers to preserving urban ecosystem services, Ecosystem Services. 12, 218–227.
[18] Li, M., Wu, J. J., & Deng, X. (2013). Identifying drivers of land use change in China: A spatial multinomial logit model analysis. Land Economics, 89(4), 632–654.
[19] Muñoz-Erickson, T. A., Campbell, L. K., Childers, D. L., Grove, J. M., Iwaniec, D. M., Pickett, S. T. A., Romolini, M., & Svendsen, E. S. (2016). Demystifying governance and its role for transitions in urban social-ecological systems. Ecosphere, 7(11), 1–11.
[20] Primmer, E., Jokinen, P., Blicharska, M., Barton, D. N., Bugter, R., & Potschin, M. (2015). Governance of Ecosystem Services: A framework for empirical analysis. Ecosystem Services, 16, 158–166.
[21] Qiu, L., Dong, Y., & Liu, H. (2022). Integrating Ecosystem Services into Planning Practice: Situation, Challenges and Inspirations. Land, 11(4).
[22] Richardson, R. B. (2010). Ecosystem services and food security: Economic perspectives on environmental sustainability. Sustainability, 2(11), 3520–3548.
[23] Schematic, T. H. E., For, D., & Model, V. I. N. A. (n.d.). ANALYZING THE MODERATING. X, 117–143.
[24] Verma, P., Singh, P., Singh, R., & Raghubanshi, A. (2020). Urban Ecology: Emerging Partners and Social-ecological Systems.
[25] Wang, Z., Owusu-prempeh, N., & Asamoah, E. F. (2016). Land-use / land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China. Scince of the Total Environment, 705–719. www.elsevier.com/locate/scitotenv
[26] Yalew, A. W. (2020). Urban Agriculture in Ethiopia : An Overview. Regional Economic Development Research, 1(2), 85–92.
[27] Yang, J., Sun, J., Ge, Q., & Li, X. (2017). Assessing the impacts of urbanization-associated green space on urban land surface temperature: A case study of Dalian, China. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 22, 1–10.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Taye, C. E., Teklemariam, D., Addis, E. (2024). Effect of Drivers of Urban Expansion on Food Security in Moderating Role of Governance Response. International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems, 10(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmfs.20241001.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Taye, C. E.; Teklemariam, D.; Addis, E. Effect of Drivers of Urban Expansion on Food Security in Moderating Role of Governance Response. Int. J. Manag. Fuzzy Syst. 2024, 10(1), 17-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmfs.20241001.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Taye CE, Teklemariam D, Addis E. Effect of Drivers of Urban Expansion on Food Security in Moderating Role of Governance Response. Int J Manag Fuzzy Syst. 2024;10(1):17-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmfs.20241001.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijmfs.20241001.12,
      author = {Chali Etefa Taye and Dereje Teklemariam and Endalew Addis},
      title = {Effect of Drivers of Urban Expansion on Food Security in Moderating Role of Governance Response
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems},
      volume = {10},
      number = {1},
      pages = {17-34},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijmfs.20241001.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmfs.20241001.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmfs.20241001.12},
      abstract = {This study examines effect of urban expansion on food security in moderating role of governance response in Addis Ababa. The purpose of the study was to create understanding regarding the nexus between drivers of urban expansion, peri-urban livelihood food security and the moderation role of the governance responses. The study design was concurrent explanatory design. It was concurrent explanatory cross sectional due to collection of both forms of data roughly at the same time. The data collected were analyzed by using structural equation model and thematic analysis. Both primary and secondary data sources were incorporated in this study for complementary and triangulation purposes. The data were collected from randomly selected exurban household heads of Limi Kura Sub-city (woreda 6 and 14) and Akaki Kality Sub-city (woreda 9 and 13). Of the total returned responses, 382 questionnaires, 52 interviewees of whom 36 for in-depth interviews and 16 for key informant interview (KII) were analyzed by using SPSS version 25, AMOS and MAXQDA 2020. The moderating role of the government abate the negative relationship between drivers of urban expansion and food security by 59%, the interview result suggests the need for strong institution framework and policy response to minimize the exposure of exurban households. Thus, the researcher suggested the strong governance intervention through institutional and policy intervention as well as revisiting alternative strategies of inclusive and sustainable development. Furthermore, the researcher also suggested the need to give attention to the issue of urban expansion swallowing of ecosystem service and posing threat to food security.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effect of Drivers of Urban Expansion on Food Security in Moderating Role of Governance Response
    
    AU  - Chali Etefa Taye
    AU  - Dereje Teklemariam
    AU  - Endalew Addis
    Y1  - 2024/11/29
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmfs.20241001.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijmfs.20241001.12
    T2  - International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems
    JF  - International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems
    JO  - International Journal of Management and Fuzzy Systems
    SP  - 17
    EP  - 34
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-4947
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmfs.20241001.12
    AB  - This study examines effect of urban expansion on food security in moderating role of governance response in Addis Ababa. The purpose of the study was to create understanding regarding the nexus between drivers of urban expansion, peri-urban livelihood food security and the moderation role of the governance responses. The study design was concurrent explanatory design. It was concurrent explanatory cross sectional due to collection of both forms of data roughly at the same time. The data collected were analyzed by using structural equation model and thematic analysis. Both primary and secondary data sources were incorporated in this study for complementary and triangulation purposes. The data were collected from randomly selected exurban household heads of Limi Kura Sub-city (woreda 6 and 14) and Akaki Kality Sub-city (woreda 9 and 13). Of the total returned responses, 382 questionnaires, 52 interviewees of whom 36 for in-depth interviews and 16 for key informant interview (KII) were analyzed by using SPSS version 25, AMOS and MAXQDA 2020. The moderating role of the government abate the negative relationship between drivers of urban expansion and food security by 59%, the interview result suggests the need for strong institution framework and policy response to minimize the exposure of exurban households. Thus, the researcher suggested the strong governance intervention through institutional and policy intervention as well as revisiting alternative strategies of inclusive and sustainable development. Furthermore, the researcher also suggested the need to give attention to the issue of urban expansion swallowing of ecosystem service and posing threat to food security.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information